Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals explains how Florida’s 2020 Census undercount—about 750,000 residents (3.48%)—reduced the state’s political representation and likely cost billions of dollars in federal funding over the decade. The report examines what Florida stood to gain if the count had been accurate and how proposed changes to who is counted could affect future apportionment.
The analysis uses the U.S. Census Bureau’s Post-Enumeration Survey to correct state populations for net coverage error and applies the standard Method of Equal Proportions used for U.S. House apportionment. Three scenarios are modeled: an accurate count of all residents, an accurate count excluding unauthorized immigrants, and an accurate count of citizens only.
In every scenario, Florida gains at least one additional U.S. House seat; in the scenario excluding unauthorized immigrants, Florida gains two. Any added House seat also adds one Electoral College vote, underscoring the importance of an accurate count to Florida’s national influence.
The report notes data limits—estimates for unauthorized immigrants and non-citizens inherit some weaknesses from census-derived products, and the model assumes the same coverage error across groups even though error rates differ by race and ethnicity. These limits may shift state-by-state changes, but they do not alter the core finding: Florida loses out when it is undercounted.
To protect representation and funding in 2030, the report recommends early, statewide support for the Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA)—including a Governor’s Office liaison to coordinate with local governments and legislative funding for technical assistance—and early outreach to hard-to-count communities through trusted local partners. Regardless of federal policy debates, these steps can help secure a fair count and the seats and dollars that follow.