/ Categories: Op-Eds

'Tampon Tax' Highlights Need to Review All Tax Exemptions

The debate over the “tampon tax” has sparked a healthy discussion about our state’s tax system. We hope lawmakers take advantage of the public attention on this issue to review all of the quirks and loopholes in taxation.

The “tampon tax” refers to Floridians paying a sales tax on feminine hygiene products while items like bandages and some other medical supplies are not taxed. Florida taxes tampons because they are considered “hygiene products.”

Florida exempts numerous health care related items from the sales and use tax with the idea that consumers should not be burdened with extra costs for life’s necessities.

In the Sunshine State, sales taxes are collected on most retails sales, but many exemptions exist, including necessities such as prescription drugs and groceries. However, bureaucrats are left to make distinctions in grey areas. The results can be puzzling and our state’s tax exemptions are riddled with peculiarities.

For example, while chocolate and peanuts are not taxed, chocolate-covered peanuts are. A quart of ice cream is tax-exempt; a pint of ice cream is taxed because it is considered a one-time eating event rather than a larger grocery purchase.

This isn’t a question of revenue; the tax collected on tampons is minimal in the scope of the state’s $80 billion-plus budget. But a tax rate of up to 7.5 percent on this product can add up over time with more than $100 paid individually in taxes on this essential item.

The “tampon tax” has become a national cause and Florida lawmakers could consider the exemption during the 2017 Legislative Session. Other states have already addressed this issue. The New York legislature unanimously voted to exempt tampons and other feminine hygiene products from the state’s sales tax in May of this year. New York joins New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Minnesota in not imposing sales taxes on tampons. Additionally, the California Assembly passed a bill to exempt tampons and sanitary wipes.

For Floridians to have faith in their investments in state government, we must always work toward making sure that each dollar taken from taxpayers is fair and justified. Lawmakers owe it to Floridians to review this and other proposed exemptions to make sure our tax system is clear, logical and equitable.

Since 77 percent of our state revenue comes from the sales and use tax, it is essential that Floridians both understand and fundamentally support why and what items the Legislature chooses to exempt from taxation.

Robert Weissert, Esq. is the Executive Vice President and Counsel to the President and CEO at Florida TaxWatch

Print
2501
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive