/ Categories: Blog

The "He-Said, She-Said" of Medicaid Managed Care

The Senate Appropriation Subcommittee on Health and Human Services learned just how expensive getting old is, particularly when nursing home care is required.  The first subcommittee meeting, which was held just before the holidays, focused on Florida’s Statewide Medicaid Managed Care, Long Term Care Program (SMMC-LTC).  Given a SFY 16-17 program budget of $3.97 billion, the Subcommittee (and TaxWatch) is keenly interested.  The Agency for HealthCare Administration (AHCA) Interim Secretary Justin Senior, various healthcare providers, and managed care companies presented to the Subcommittee.  Not unexpectedly, each entity offered a different perspective, particularly concerning payment issues.

The SMMC-LTC program grew out of the need for the state to control Medicaid spending.  The median annual cost of a semi-private room in one of Florida’s 683 licensed nursing homes is $87,600.  Considering the median net worth of Floridians is about $54,000, many cannot afford the cost of their long term care.  In 2012, Medicaid picked up the tab for nearly 70% of nursing home costs under a fee-for-service payment model.   

The roll-out of the SMMC-LTC was completed in March, 2014.  Along with the switch to a capitation payment plan, the program offers incentives to transition people from or delaying entrance to nursing homes in favor of less restrictive (and less expensive) options, including assisted living facilities and aging in place.  Managed care companies contract with providers for health-related services not covered by Medicare (home health aids, adult day care) and ancillary services (cell phones, utility deposits, food delivery, lawn care, etc.)   In order to qualify for enrollment in LTC you must be financially and medically eligible – meaning you must be 65-years of age or older (or 18+ and permanently disabled), require “nursing facility level of care,” and qualify for Medicaid. 

So is the program working for the 94,077 Floridians enrolled?  It depends on who you ask.

In July, 2013 a total of 50,122 Floridians were in nursing homes.  As of July 2016, the number has dropped to 42,161 people.  ACHA states that in 2016 alone, taxpayers saved $433 million in deferred costs by caring for Floridians in their homes and communities instead in more expensive nursing homes.  Clients and their families generally like the program and 76% of those surveyed indicated that their quality of life has improved.  In addition, ACHA has had very few complaints – less than 2 complaints per 1,000 enrollees – and they think this rate is the mark of a good program.  However, complaints, specifically payment complaints, are central to the issue.  Without a doubt, ACHA finds late payment of “clean claims” (claims that require no additional information) unacceptable and they have in place an arbitration firm to dispose of any issues.  However, the providers and managed care companies have very different stories to tell.

Providers indicate that many “clean claims” are not being paid within the mandatory 10 day period.   The Florida Healthcare Association, which represents 82% of the state’s nursing care centers, estimates that managed care companies are $135 million dollars behind in provider payments across the state.  Furthermore, providers fail to file complaints with ACHA due to the lack of resolution to previously filed complaints, calling into question the accuracy of the ACHA complaint rate.  On the flip side are the managed care companies.  One company, Sunshine Health, which covers 42% of Florida’s LTC clients, state that their payment history is “laudatory.”  The company states they pay most claims within 6.5 days with a 99.2% accuracy rate.

TaxWatch encourages a continued and open discussion on all the issues impacting the SMMC-LTC program.   This program is a vital safety net program, providing care for some of the most vulnerable Floridians, something we all must keep in mind moving forward.

Note:  Allison Wiman attended 12/14/2016 Subcommittee meeting.  Some of the information presented in this brief was provided verbally during the Subcommittee meeting.  A recording of the meeting is currently available on the thefloridachannel.org    
Print
2440
0Upvote 0Downvote
«February 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
26
Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

For more than 60 years, Florida’s Space Coast—anchored by Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)—has served as a premier gateway to space, driving tourism, high-tech jobs, and statewide economic output. After major federal program shifts in the 2010s led to significant regional job losses, Florida’s modern commercial-space resurgence—supported by Space Florida’s strategy to diversify the supply chain, modernize infrastructure, and attract private capital—has positioned the Space Coast to lead the next era of aerospace growth.

Read more
27282930311
2345
New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

The General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on January 23 to adopt Florida’s latest GR forecast—the estimate that tells lawmakers how much is available for the next state budget. The updated forecast adds $572.5 million to the amount available for the upcoming budget year, but while meaningful, it amounts to only about one percent of total GR collections.

Read more
678
910
Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Florida TaxWatch examines the City of Clearwater’s plan to acquire Duke Energy Florida’s electric distribution assets and establish a municipal electric utility (MEU) in response to concerns over electric rates and service quality. While the City’s feasibility study projects modest short-term rate savings, Florida TaxWatch finds those projections rely on unrealistic assumptions—most notably an “overnight” conversion that ignores the likely decade-long, costly eminent domain process required to acquire Duke’s assets. Drawing on national municipalization case studies, the report highlights high failure rates, underestimated acquisition and severance costs, loss of economies of scale, and substantial financial exposure for taxpayers. Florida TaxWatch concludes that the proposed MEU represents a high-risk endeavor with limited upside and recommends the City pursue a renegotiated franchise agreement with Duke Energy Florida as a more prudent path forward.

Read more
1112131415
16171819202122
2324252627281
2345678

Archive