/ Categories: Blog

The "He-Said, She-Said" of Medicaid Managed Care

The Senate Appropriation Subcommittee on Health and Human Services learned just how expensive getting old is, particularly when nursing home care is required.  The first subcommittee meeting, which was held just before the holidays, focused on Florida’s Statewide Medicaid Managed Care, Long Term Care Program (SMMC-LTC).  Given a SFY 16-17 program budget of $3.97 billion, the Subcommittee (and TaxWatch) is keenly interested.  The Agency for HealthCare Administration (AHCA) Interim Secretary Justin Senior, various healthcare providers, and managed care companies presented to the Subcommittee.  Not unexpectedly, each entity offered a different perspective, particularly concerning payment issues.

The SMMC-LTC program grew out of the need for the state to control Medicaid spending.  The median annual cost of a semi-private room in one of Florida’s 683 licensed nursing homes is $87,600.  Considering the median net worth of Floridians is about $54,000, many cannot afford the cost of their long term care.  In 2012, Medicaid picked up the tab for nearly 70% of nursing home costs under a fee-for-service payment model.   

The roll-out of the SMMC-LTC was completed in March, 2014.  Along with the switch to a capitation payment plan, the program offers incentives to transition people from or delaying entrance to nursing homes in favor of less restrictive (and less expensive) options, including assisted living facilities and aging in place.  Managed care companies contract with providers for health-related services not covered by Medicare (home health aids, adult day care) and ancillary services (cell phones, utility deposits, food delivery, lawn care, etc.)   In order to qualify for enrollment in LTC you must be financially and medically eligible – meaning you must be 65-years of age or older (or 18+ and permanently disabled), require “nursing facility level of care,” and qualify for Medicaid. 

So is the program working for the 94,077 Floridians enrolled?  It depends on who you ask.

In July, 2013 a total of 50,122 Floridians were in nursing homes.  As of July 2016, the number has dropped to 42,161 people.  ACHA states that in 2016 alone, taxpayers saved $433 million in deferred costs by caring for Floridians in their homes and communities instead in more expensive nursing homes.  Clients and their families generally like the program and 76% of those surveyed indicated that their quality of life has improved.  In addition, ACHA has had very few complaints – less than 2 complaints per 1,000 enrollees – and they think this rate is the mark of a good program.  However, complaints, specifically payment complaints, are central to the issue.  Without a doubt, ACHA finds late payment of “clean claims” (claims that require no additional information) unacceptable and they have in place an arbitration firm to dispose of any issues.  However, the providers and managed care companies have very different stories to tell.

Providers indicate that many “clean claims” are not being paid within the mandatory 10 day period.   The Florida Healthcare Association, which represents 82% of the state’s nursing care centers, estimates that managed care companies are $135 million dollars behind in provider payments across the state.  Furthermore, providers fail to file complaints with ACHA due to the lack of resolution to previously filed complaints, calling into question the accuracy of the ACHA complaint rate.  On the flip side are the managed care companies.  One company, Sunshine Health, which covers 42% of Florida’s LTC clients, state that their payment history is “laudatory.”  The company states they pay most claims within 6.5 days with a 99.2% accuracy rate.

TaxWatch encourages a continued and open discussion on all the issues impacting the SMMC-LTC program.   This program is a vital safety net program, providing care for some of the most vulnerable Floridians, something we all must keep in mind moving forward.

Note:  Allison Wiman attended 12/14/2016 Subcommittee meeting.  Some of the information presented in this brief was provided verbally during the Subcommittee meeting.  A recording of the meeting is currently available on the thefloridachannel.org    
Print
2361
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive