Revisiting Efforts to Deregulate Florida’s Electric Power Market What We Learned from Texas' Blackouts

Florida’s economy depends in large part on the availability of reliable and affordable electric power. Like most states, Florida has a regulated energy market that considers electric power to be an essential service for its economic well-being. The interests of electric utilities and their customers are addressed by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) which sets reasonable rates and standards for reliability, ensures quality of services, and protects the consumers. Good regulatory policy promotes the alignments of those interests.

Two years ago, a constitutional amendment was proposed that, if approved by 60 percent of the voters, would have required Florida to “deregulate” its retail market for electric power. Florida’s IOUs would have been required to sell their generation assets to companies not regulated by the PSC. In a deregulated market, the price consumers pay for the transmission and distribution of electricity is generally still regulated but the price they pay for the actual electric power generated is not; customers choose their electricity provider from among any number of retail electricity suppliers available in their area who procure from unregulated generating companies the power that those retail electricity suppliers sell to customers.

In Texas, a 2016 pricing analysis affirmed previous findings that Texans living in deregulated areas had historically paid more for electricity, on average, than Texans living in areas exempt from deregulation. All told, Texans living in deregulated areas would have saved nearly $25 billion dollars in lower residential electricity bills from 2002 through 2014 had they paid the same average prices during that period as Texans living outside deregulation. This “lost savings” amounts to more than $5,100 for a typical household.

The failure of Texas’s market-driven, deregulated electric power network begs the questions “what if the ballot proposal had passed review by the Florida Supreme Court” and “what if Florida voters had voted to deregulate Florida’s electric power network?”

Documents to download

Previous Article The Backbone of the Economy: How Small Businesses in Florida Have Fared During the Pandemic
Next Article State COVID-19 Restrictions & the Road Back to Economic Normal
Print
9922
0Upvote 0Downvote
«April 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
303112
Cost of Living in Florida: A Mid-Decade Check-In

Cost of Living in Florida: A Mid-Decade Check-In

For millions of Floridians, the defining economic question of the mid-2020s isn't about growth or GDP — it's about whether they can still afford to stay.

Read more
345
6789
Tourism in Central Florida: Why Tourist Development Tax Revenue Should Not Be Diverted

Tourism in Central Florida: Why Tourist Development Tax Revenue Should Not Be Diverted

To remain competitive and sustain Florida’s share of the U.S. tourism market, Florida must continue to invest in tourism marketing and promotion to make sure that when tourists begin to plan their next vacation, they think first of Florida. Florida TaxWatch recommends the Legislature not approve any legislation that permits local governments divert the use of TDT-generated revenue from tourism marketing to support other activities.

Read more
101112
1314
Taxpayer Independence Day 2026

Taxpayer Independence Day 2026

Friday, April 17 is Florida Taxpayer Independence Day 2026 — the symbolic date when the average Florida household has earned enough to satisfy all federal, state, and local tax obligations for the year. In 2026, that takes 106 out of 365 days, or just over three and a half months. On a daily basis, Floridians' Taxpayer Independence Time falls at 11:19 a.m. each workday.

Read more
1516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910

Archive