The Impacts of Impact Fees on the Cost of Housing

Impact fees are (typically) one-time payments imposed on a property developer by a unit of local government. The amount of the impact fee is determined based upon such things as the size of the development and its impacts on the surrounding community. Compared to property tax increases, impact fees are a popular alternative to fund needed infrastructure upgrades because the costs of new infrastructure and services are paid by the property developer and not by the taxpayers who already live there. The Florida legislature considers impact fees to be an “important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth.” 

 

An impact fee imposed by a local government should meet a dual “rational nexus” (rational linkage) test in order to withstand legal challenge. First, a reasonable connection should exist between the anticipated need for additional capital facilities and the population growth generated by the new development. Second, a rational nexus should exist between the local government’s expenditure of impact fee proceeds and the benefits accruing to the new development from those proceeds. The amount of an impact fee should be a “fair” or “proportionate” share of the costs of improvements made necessary by a new development and cannot be imposed to address existing deficiencies (except where exacerbated by the new development). 

 

Impact fees are frequently cited as a factor that drives up the cost of housing. This is critical in a state like Florida, where soaring rent and home prices are making it more difficult for tens of thousands of working and middle-class Florida households to put a roof over their heads. In February 2023, Realtor.com named Miami as the least affordable city in America, with average monthly rents in the metropolitan area exceeding $2,900. Miami’s typical rent takes up 60 percent of a household’s typical income. Miami, along with Tampa and Orlando, have had the fastest growing rents in the country over the past year. 

 

The development community often complains that impact fees drive housing prices up and construction down. Of particular concern is the complaint that impact fees are regressive in nature, placing a disproportionate burden on low-income groups and creating negative effects on housing affordability. Local governments say that impact fees are the only feasible means of financing sufficient new infrastructure in a tax-averse political environment and that they may actually have many positive effects on communities, “serving more as an efficient user fee than as a tax.” 

 

Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand the effect of impact fees on housing prices. 

Documents to download

Previous Article Taxpayer Independence Day 2023
Next Article Session Spotlight: Not Funding VISIT FLORIDA Would Hurt Tourism Promotion and Florida’s Economy
Print
7504
0Upvote 0Downvote
«February 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
26
Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

For more than 60 years, Florida’s Space Coast—anchored by Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)—has served as a premier gateway to space, driving tourism, high-tech jobs, and statewide economic output. After major federal program shifts in the 2010s led to significant regional job losses, Florida’s modern commercial-space resurgence—supported by Space Florida’s strategy to diversify the supply chain, modernize infrastructure, and attract private capital—has positioned the Space Coast to lead the next era of aerospace growth.

Read more
27282930311
2345
New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

The General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on January 23 to adopt Florida’s latest GR forecast—the estimate that tells lawmakers how much is available for the next state budget. The updated forecast adds $572.5 million to the amount available for the upcoming budget year, but while meaningful, it amounts to only about one percent of total GR collections.

Read more
678
910
Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Florida TaxWatch examines the City of Clearwater’s plan to acquire Duke Energy Florida’s electric distribution assets and establish a municipal electric utility (MEU) in response to concerns over electric rates and service quality. While the City’s feasibility study projects modest short-term rate savings, Florida TaxWatch finds those projections rely on unrealistic assumptions—most notably an “overnight” conversion that ignores the likely decade-long, costly eminent domain process required to acquire Duke’s assets. Drawing on national municipalization case studies, the report highlights high failure rates, underestimated acquisition and severance costs, loss of economies of scale, and substantial financial exposure for taxpayers. Florida TaxWatch concludes that the proposed MEU represents a high-risk endeavor with limited upside and recommends the City pursue a renegotiated franchise agreement with Duke Energy Florida as a more prudent path forward.

Read more
1112131415
16171819202122
2324252627281
2345678

Archive