Budget Watch - Comparing the House and Senate Budgets

The House and Senate have passed their respective budgets and now must hold budget conference meetings to negotiate the differences. Agreement must be reached on every number and every word in the 400-plus page appropriations bill. Since lawmakers are constitutionally required to wait 72 hours before a final vote, a mutually agreed-upon budget must be produced by Tuesday, April 27 in order for an on-time finish of the session on Friday, April 30.


THE BUDGET IN CONTEXT

  • The Senate budget (SB 2500) totals $95.0 billion while the House (HB 5001) comes in at $97.1 billion.
  • The House budget is $4.8 billion more than current year spending, the Senate’s is about $2.7 billion more. The increase is due to federal funds (but no American Rescue Plan funds). Both chambers use approximately $2 billion in increased federal Medicaid funding.
  • There is little change in general revenue spending. The House spends $161 million (0.5%) more than current year, the Senate only $4 million more.
  • Not counting federal education funds that the House uses but the Senate does not, both budgets are about $2.5 billion less (approximately $1 billion less in GR) than the Governor’s budget recommendations.

Despite the $2.1 billion difference in the chambers’ bottom lines, they are not that far apart. The difference in the bottom lines is largely due to the House’s use of $2 billion in Elementary and Secondary Emergency Education Relief (ESSER) Funding from the federal government.


But as usual, there are some significant differences in the details. The use of federal funds will be one of the major issues of the conference, especially the $10 billion Florida will get from the American Rescue Plan’s Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund. Florida will get also get $7 billion in ESSER funds. Except for the $2 billion in ESSER funds mentioned above, none of these stimulus funds are included in either chamber’s budget total (see Federal Stimulus Funds on page 8). If the chambers decide to appropriate some of the ARP funds, Florida could see its first $100 billion budget.

Documents to download

Previous Article Calling for Clarity: Florida’s Confusing and Conflicting Scheme for Taxing Government Leaseholds Needs Legislative Attention
Next Article Letter to the Governor on E-Fairness
Print
4030
0Upvote 0Downvote
«February 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
26
Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

For more than 60 years, Florida’s Space Coast—anchored by Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)—has served as a premier gateway to space, driving tourism, high-tech jobs, and statewide economic output. After major federal program shifts in the 2010s led to significant regional job losses, Florida’s modern commercial-space resurgence—supported by Space Florida’s strategy to diversify the supply chain, modernize infrastructure, and attract private capital—has positioned the Space Coast to lead the next era of aerospace growth.

Read more
27282930311
2345
New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

The General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on January 23 to adopt Florida’s latest GR forecast—the estimate that tells lawmakers how much is available for the next state budget. The updated forecast adds $572.5 million to the amount available for the upcoming budget year, but while meaningful, it amounts to only about one percent of total GR collections.

Read more
678
910
Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Florida TaxWatch examines the City of Clearwater’s plan to acquire Duke Energy Florida’s electric distribution assets and establish a municipal electric utility (MEU) in response to concerns over electric rates and service quality. While the City’s feasibility study projects modest short-term rate savings, Florida TaxWatch finds those projections rely on unrealistic assumptions—most notably an “overnight” conversion that ignores the likely decade-long, costly eminent domain process required to acquire Duke’s assets. Drawing on national municipalization case studies, the report highlights high failure rates, underestimated acquisition and severance costs, loss of economies of scale, and substantial financial exposure for taxpayers. Florida TaxWatch concludes that the proposed MEU represents a high-risk endeavor with limited upside and recommends the City pursue a renegotiated franchise agreement with Duke Energy Florida as a more prudent path forward.

Read more
1112131415
16171819202122
2324252627281
2345678

Archive