/ Categories: Research

Florida’s Proposed Privacy Protection Act

 

Due to the proliferation of data-driven products and services over the past few years, many countries and states around the world have adopted laws relating to the data collection and use of personal information. In Florida, HB 969 and SB 1734—also known as the “Florida Privacy Protection Act” (FPPA)–represent the latest foray into this space and would create new regulations about how businesses disclose information to online customers about how personal information is collected, used, and safeguarded. Businesses that are subject to the laws would be required to give consumers notice of their privacy rights and notice of when consumer information is bought or sold. Consumers’ opt-out would prevent companies from selling their data to third-party data brokers, data profiling, and targeted advertisers.

For businesses around the state of Florida, the implementation of the new data privacy law would require many companies to comply with new regulations, creating compliance costs both at the onset and over time. Incorporating the SUSB data specific to Florida, the total cost of initial compliance for FPPA is estimated at $36.5 billion, constituting the vast majority of compliance efforts and representing 3.3 percent of Florida’s Gross State Product in 2019. Beyond the initial cost of compliance, companies will also incur costs for ongoing compliance over successive years; however, a bulk of the overall compliance costs will be at the onset of any privacy law enactment (roughly $36.5 billion).

ANALYSIS:

  • SMALL BUSINESSES ARE LIKELY TO FACE A DISPROPORTIONATELY HIGHER SHARE OF COMPLIANCE COSTS RELATIVE TO LARGER ENTERPRISES.
  • DATA PRIVACY REGULATION MAY SERVE AS A DISINCENTIVE FOR COMPANIES TO RELOCATE TO FLORIDA.
  • CONSUMERS MAY DERIVE AN ECONOMIC BENEFIT FROM PRIVACY PROTECTIONS GRANTED BY THE PROPOSED LAW CHANGES.
  • DIFFERENTIAL BENEFITS TO CONSUMERS LARGELY BASED ON INCOME DIFFERENCES MAY INTRODUCE EQUITY CONCERNS.
  • THE PROPOSED PRIVACY LAWS MAY INTRODUCE A BOON IN PRIVATE LITIGATION, CREATING ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR COMPANIES AND OCCUPYING MORE RESOURCES FROM COURTS.

Florida TaxWatch recommends that state policymakers take cost estimates into mind while considering data privacy legislation. Specifically, TaxWatch recommends that policymakers analyze the unintentional costs that may accrue to smaller businesses in the wake of these legislative changes, and weigh them against the potential benefits to consumers from greater data privacy. Due to the pandemic’s ongoing strain on Florida’s economic recovery, and in the absence of accurate compliance cost estimates for businesses within Florida, state policymakers should at least first conduct a formal economic impact analysis to study the possible effects of the law change and delay implementation beyond January 1, 2022 until more can be known.

Documents to download

Previous Article Economic Commentary - The State of Medicaid in Florida
Next Article Calling all Cars? Florida’s Statewide Law Enforcement Radio System (SLERS-2) Underscores the Need for Procurement Reform
Print
9185
0Upvote 0Downvote
«June 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728293031
1
Florida TaxWatch Provides Analysis of the Governor’s Property Tax Amendment and Legislation, Recommends Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission Lead Debate

Florida TaxWatch Provides Analysis of the Governor’s Property Tax Amendment and Legislation, Recommends Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission Lead Debate

The Florida Legislature is meeting in special session to consider Governor DeSantis’ proposed constitutional amendment and linked legislation to provide significant property tax relief to Florida homeowners. The proposal has many provisions, but the main ones would increase the homestead exemption to $150,000, beginning January 1, 2027, and then increase it to $250,000, beginning January 1, 2028. This exemption will apply to all property taxes. In addition, the cap on the annual increase in the assessment of non-homestead properties would be reduced from 10% to 5%, but this change would not apply to school property tax levies. Any property taxes remaining after the changes would be restricted to being used solely for core services such as public safety, education, infrastructure, debt, and retirement benefits.

Read more
234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive