A Catalyst for Growth

Florida is home to one of the most robust and expanding economies in the United States. In fact, with a GDP that is larger than most countries (17th largest in the world), Florida is a global economic power, and to increase our standing, it is crucial that the state is able to successfully attract new and expanding businesses.

When businesses decide where to relocate or expand, many factors can tip the scales in one direction or the other. Created as a way to encourage investment by offsetting taxes, fees, or other costs, economic development incentives can make a significant difference for a new or expanding business considering a change. Every state offers some kind of incentives to businesses, generally using reductions in taxes, loans from the state, or grants to make their state the best option for specific companies or industries.

The competition among states in attracting businesses is fierce, because convincing a large company to relocate or build an office, manufacturing plant, etc., in a state can lead to tens of thousands of jobs, and billions of dollars in capital flowing through that state’s economy.

As technology has given businesses the ability to invest almost anywhere, the use of economic development incentives has grown significantly, creating a bit of an arms race between states competing for job creation and economic development. While these benefits are seen by critics as a “handout” to business, a state attempting to compete in the modern economy without using at least some incentives would be akin to a college in a major athletic conference attempting to field competitive teams without offering the scholarships available to them.

It would be naïve to believe that a state could successfully implement a robust economic development strategy without offering appropriate companies an environment within which they could flourish, create new jobs, and provide a positive economic impact. Incentives are, and must be seen as, simply one tool in the economic development arsenal of a state government, but the impact of this one tool can have long-lasting effects. Economic development incentives are not a substitute for the fundamentals of good economic growth, like a good tax structure and a well-trained workforce, but they cannot be ignored as a part of the overall strategy for economic development.

Documents to download

Previous Article Building Florida's High-Tech Manufacturing Sector
Next Article Budget Watch - Proposed House and Senate Budgets for FY2016-17 are $1 Billion Apart
Print
3387
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive