Budget Watch - Proposed Budgets for FY2017-18 Far Apart

As we enter the penultimate week of the 2017 Legislative Session, the next state budget is still very much up in the air. The House and Senate spending plans are effectively $4 billion apart. The House budget totals $81.237 billion, and the Senate budget comes in at $83.164 billion, but that does not include almost $2 billion in university tuition that is usually included in the budget (and is included by the House).

Some of the major differences include environmental funding, economic development programs, tourism marketing, the amount of local property taxes for public school funding, universities, member projects, and state employee pay raises. The Senate also funds 113,563 state positions, 1,335 more than the House. The House generally appropriates less money for agency operations.

Conference negotiations have not yet begun and behind the scenes negotiations have not gone smoothly. This morning (April 25), the House convened a special meeting of the Appropriations Committee to pass what it called a continuation budget. The means the same budget as last year, with some necessary changes and all non-recurring appropriations taken out. This was portrayed as a “take it or leave it” offer to the Senate, and the Senate President has subsequently said they will leave it.

There are rumblings of a deal on a basic budget framework and allocations for the various appropriations subcommittees could be released soon, setting the stage for a budget conference. The state constitution requires a 72-hour review period after the conference report is printed before it may be voted on. The conference report cannot be amended; if one chamber votes it down, they must start over.

The Legislature is running out of time to pass the budget before the session ends on May 5. If it fails to do so, lawmakers will have to come back in an extended or special session to pass a budget before the new fiscal year begins on July 1.

As the Legislature prepares to go into budget conference, or pushes it to a later date, this Budget Watch examines the two spending plans and highlights some of the differences that are causing the conflict.

Documents to download

Previous Article The Outlook for Tax Relief from the 2017 Legislature
Next Article 2017 Final Tax Package Analysis
Print
3170
0Upvote 0Downvote
«February 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
26
Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

For more than 60 years, Florida’s Space Coast—anchored by Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)—has served as a premier gateway to space, driving tourism, high-tech jobs, and statewide economic output. After major federal program shifts in the 2010s led to significant regional job losses, Florida’s modern commercial-space resurgence—supported by Space Florida’s strategy to diversify the supply chain, modernize infrastructure, and attract private capital—has positioned the Space Coast to lead the next era of aerospace growth.

Read more
27282930311
2345
New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

The General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on January 23 to adopt Florida’s latest GR forecast—the estimate that tells lawmakers how much is available for the next state budget. The updated forecast adds $572.5 million to the amount available for the upcoming budget year, but while meaningful, it amounts to only about one percent of total GR collections.

Read more
678
910
Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Florida TaxWatch examines the City of Clearwater’s plan to acquire Duke Energy Florida’s electric distribution assets and establish a municipal electric utility (MEU) in response to concerns over electric rates and service quality. While the City’s feasibility study projects modest short-term rate savings, Florida TaxWatch finds those projections rely on unrealistic assumptions—most notably an “overnight” conversion that ignores the likely decade-long, costly eminent domain process required to acquire Duke’s assets. Drawing on national municipalization case studies, the report highlights high failure rates, underestimated acquisition and severance costs, loss of economies of scale, and substantial financial exposure for taxpayers. Florida TaxWatch concludes that the proposed MEU represents a high-risk endeavor with limited upside and recommends the City pursue a renegotiated franchise agreement with Duke Energy Florida as a more prudent path forward.

Read more
1112131415
16171819202122
2324252627281
2345678

Archive