Derailing Brightline – The Cost of Taxpayer-Funded Lawsuits

America’s love affair with trains began in the 1860s with the creation of the first intercontinental railroad. Linking the east and west coasts by rail opened new opportunities for commerce and began a love affair between Americans and trains that continues to this day. The construction of additional railroad lines facilitated the establishment and growth of towns in the Midwest and West by providing a relatively rapid means of transporting goods and people. Towns depended on the railroads and, therefore, were developed along railroad lines. In the East, railroads were built to serve existing towns and cities.

All Aboard Florida (AAF) is a privately-owned and operated intercity passenger rail service. When fully operational, AAF will provide express passenger rail service (known as “Brightline”) from Miami to Orlando, with stops in Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. With top speeds ranging from 79 mph to 125 mph, and a minimal number of planned stops between Miami and Orlando, Brightline will offer passengers an opportunity to travel from Orlando to Miami in roughly three hours.

Unlike other high-speed rail projects, Brightline will not require direct taxpayer appropriations. Ridership risk will be borne by the private sector. Funding for the construction and operation of Brightline will come from a combination of tax-exempt private activity bonds (PABs), which are backed by project revenues, and federal Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program loans and loan guarantees. Should the project default, only those who invested in the project are on the hook, not the taxpayers.

When completed, Brightline will pass through the Treasure Coast region of the state without any planned stops. This has prompted local governments in the Treasure Coast region to pursue legislative and legal remedies in an attempt to derail Brightline.

Documents to download

  • AAF-FINAL(.pdf, 1.82 MB) - 2494 download(s)

Previous Article 2017 Annual Report
Next Article Budget Watch - Proposed Budgets Close in Amount, but Big Differences Remain
Print
11662
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive