Why Taxpayers Should Care about Workforce Instability with Florida’s Public Defenders and State Attorneys

The right to have the assistance of competent defense counsel is implemented through 20 offices of public defenders, one in each judicial circuit. Public defenders and their appointed staff are licensed attorneys who are paid by the state to represent indigent defendants in criminal cases. Their prosecutorial counterparts in each judicial circuit are the state attorneys. State attorneys and their appointed staff are the chief prosecuting officers of all criminal trial courts in their respective circuit and are responsible for seeing that the laws of Florida are faithfully executed. It is essential that the Office of the Public Defender and the Office of the State Attorney in each judicial circuit be properly staffed and supported to make this system work. Providing competitive wages, flexible working conditions, and manageable caseloads, while maintaining low rates of employee turnover, is critical to maintaining a viable job market and a sustainable and competent workforce for these state agencies. Unfortunately, this is not the case in Florida. Both Assistant Public Defenders (APDs) and their Assistant State Attorney (ASA) counterparts are experiencing low salaries and punishing caseloads, which contribute to high rates of employee turnover and frustrating judicial outcomes for those that are represented. In 2004 and 2014, Florida TaxWatch published research reports on APD and ASA salaries and, almost a decade later, salaries for APDs and ASAs is still an issue. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to update its 2004 and 2014 reports on salaries for APDs and ASAs and to gain a better understanding of how low salaries, heavy caseloads, limited work flexibility, and high turnover rates for state attorneys and public defenders affect the workforce stability of these critical positions and the Florida taxpayers they serve and represent.

Documents to download

Previous Article A Closer Look at Florida’s Sales Tax Exemptions
Next Article Commentary: An Inappropriate Cost of Doing Business: Paying the Interchange Fee on Sales Tax for Credit Card Purchases
Print
3978
0Upvote 0Downvote
«September 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728
Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Florida has proven ideas, demonstrated wins, and active tools; now it needs permanence. By embedding efficiency into the annual budget cycle—backed by transparent tracking and regular reporting—the state can convert sporadic initiatives into sustained savings and better service delivery for taxpayers.

Read more
293031
12
Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals explains how Florida’s 2020 Census undercount—about 750,000 residents (3.48%)—reduced the state’s political representation and likely cost billions of dollars in federal funding over the decade. The report examines what Florida stood to gain if the count had been accurate and how proposed changes to who is counted could affect future apportionment.

Read more
34
The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

Florida TaxWatch’s The Taxpayers’ Guide to Florida’s FY2025-26 State Budget explains the Legislature’s $114.8 billion spending plan (after $376 million in line-item vetoes)—a 3.2% decrease from FY2024-25—while maintaining $12.6 billion in reserves. General Revenue (GR) spending rises by $556 million, and the recurring GR base increases by $1.9 billion, even as total positions fall to 111,886 (-1,871).

Read more
567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive