The Impacts of Impact Fees on the Cost of Housing

Impact fees are (typically) one-time payments imposed on a property developer by a unit of local government. The amount of the impact fee is determined based upon such things as the size of the development and its impacts on the surrounding community. Compared to property tax increases, impact fees are a popular alternative to fund needed infrastructure upgrades because the costs of new infrastructure and services are paid by the property developer and not by the taxpayers who already live there. The Florida legislature considers impact fees to be an “important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth.” 

 

An impact fee imposed by a local government should meet a dual “rational nexus” (rational linkage) test in order to withstand legal challenge. First, a reasonable connection should exist between the anticipated need for additional capital facilities and the population growth generated by the new development. Second, a rational nexus should exist between the local government’s expenditure of impact fee proceeds and the benefits accruing to the new development from those proceeds. The amount of an impact fee should be a “fair” or “proportionate” share of the costs of improvements made necessary by a new development and cannot be imposed to address existing deficiencies (except where exacerbated by the new development). 

 

Impact fees are frequently cited as a factor that drives up the cost of housing. This is critical in a state like Florida, where soaring rent and home prices are making it more difficult for tens of thousands of working and middle-class Florida households to put a roof over their heads. In February 2023, Realtor.com named Miami as the least affordable city in America, with average monthly rents in the metropolitan area exceeding $2,900. Miami’s typical rent takes up 60 percent of a household’s typical income. Miami, along with Tampa and Orlando, have had the fastest growing rents in the country over the past year. 

 

The development community often complains that impact fees drive housing prices up and construction down. Of particular concern is the complaint that impact fees are regressive in nature, placing a disproportionate burden on low-income groups and creating negative effects on housing affordability. Local governments say that impact fees are the only feasible means of financing sufficient new infrastructure in a tax-averse political environment and that they may actually have many positive effects on communities, “serving more as an efficient user fee than as a tax.” 

 

Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand the effect of impact fees on housing prices. 

Documents to download

Previous Article Taxpayer Independence Day 2023
Next Article Session Spotlight: Not Funding VISIT FLORIDA Would Hurt Tourism Promotion and Florida’s Economy
Print
7949
0Upvote 0Downvote
«June 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728293031
1
Florida TaxWatch Provides Analysis of the Governor’s Property Tax Amendment and Legislation, Recommends Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission Lead Debate

Florida TaxWatch Provides Analysis of the Governor’s Property Tax Amendment and Legislation, Recommends Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission Lead Debate

The Florida Legislature is meeting in special session to consider Governor DeSantis’ proposed constitutional amendment and linked legislation to provide significant property tax relief to Florida homeowners. The proposal has many provisions, but the main ones would increase the homestead exemption to $150,000, beginning January 1, 2027, and then increase it to $250,000, beginning January 1, 2028. This exemption will apply to all property taxes. In addition, the cap on the annual increase in the assessment of non-homestead properties would be reduced from 10% to 5%, but this change would not apply to school property tax levies. Any property taxes remaining after the changes would be restricted to being used solely for core services such as public safety, education, infrastructure, debt, and retirement benefits.

Read more
234567
8
2026 Budget Turkey Watch Report

2026 Budget Turkey Watch Report

Since 1983, Florida TaxWatch has published this annual independent review of the state budget to promote oversight, integrity, and transparency in the appropriations process. This year’s review of Florida’s $114.5 billion budget for FY2026-27 identifies 621 items totaling $829.7 million that qualify as “Budget Turkeys.” In addition to projects that qualify as Budget Turkeys, this report highlights other areas in the budget that contain numerous member projects that, while they do not strictly meet our Budget Turkey criteria, certainly merit extra scrutiny and close gubernatorial review.  These additional 484 projects total $441.1 million.
The principle behind the Budget Turkey Watch Report is simple: taxpayer dollars should be allocated through a transparent, accountable, and deliberative processes. All appropriations, especially projects requested by individual legislators, should be subject to rigorous public review. This is especially important since these are typically projects that are local rather than statewide in scope and are often outside the core functions of state government.

Read more
91011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive