/ Categories: Blog

Lack of a Seminole Gaming Compact Proving Very Costly to Florida

The Legislature did not ratify a new Seminole Gaming Compact last session and as a result, the state has already potentially lost nearly $250 million and could lose out on another $2 billion over the next seven years. 

Governor Scott and the Tribe negotiated a new compact in December 2015. The compact required legislative ratification but some lawmakers balked at what they saw as an expansion of gambling. Other gaming issues muddied the water and the compact never made it to a vote in either chamber during the 2016 Session. 

The original compact, ratified in 2010, gave the Seminole Tribe exclusive rights to offer certain games. Slots were allowed at all seven Seminole casinos and banked card games (such as blackjack) were allowed at five casinos. In exchange, the Seminoles would pay the state an amount based on the net win. While the compact has a twenty-year term, the authorization for banked card games expired on July 31, 2015. Upon expiration, the terms of the compact provide that the state no longer receives any gaming revenue from banked card games nor from all gaming activity at the Tribe’s Broward facilities. 

The new compact would have allowed the Seminoles to offer banked card games, as well as live table games such as craps and roulette, at all seven facilities. In return, over a seven year period beginning July 31, 2107, the Tribe would make payments to the state ranging from $325 million the first year to $500 million in the seventh, for a total of $3 billion. After that, payments could increase. And in a big concession from the Seminoles, the compact would have also allowed the Legislature to authorize limited non-Seminole gaming without affecting the Tribe’s payments to the state.

However, without ratification, the authorization ceased and the state is not entitled to any revenue from those games. While the compact provided that the banked card games cease within 90 days of the authorization’s expiration, the Tribe is still offering the games. The Tribe continues to make revenue share payments to the state of $19.5 million per month, but the money is being held in reserve and can’t be spent by the state.

A new compact could still be negotiated but a recent court ruling increased the Tribe’s already considerable leverage. The Tribe and the state sued each other. The state said the banked games must end and the Tribe countered that the state violated the compact by allowing pari-mutuels to offer “designated player” games, where a player acts as the bank. Federal judge Robert Hinkle sided with the Tribe, declaring that these games were an "egregious example of the cardrooms' attempt to evade the prohibition on banked card games." As a result, the Tribe can continue to offer banked card games for the 20 year term of the original compact and does not have to share revenue with the state. 

Other Indian gaming is still expected to provide the state with $131 million in revenue during the current fiscal year. However, this is far less than would be coming in under either the old or new compact. The state General Revenue Fund receives 97 percent of this revenue and 3 percent is distributed to affected local governments.

Both House Speaker Richard Corcoran and Senate President Joe Negron have indicated the 2017 Legislature will consider a new compact and both support a deal that brings more revenue to the state. But they may not be totally on the same page. The Speaker said the House is conservative, so the compact must be conservative, resulting in a reduction of gaming in the state. The Senate President, however, is open to legislation that may increase gaming.

With it now appearing Florida will be facing a budget shortfall next session, the state cannot afford to leave this revenue on the table. Seminole gaming is going to continue and the Tribe has proven to be a willing partner. While it may be difficult to negotiate a compact as lucrative as the last one, the 2017 Legislature needs to focus on ratifying a Seminole Gaming Compact and not let peripheral gaming issues get in the way.

Print
2159
0Upvote 0Downvote
«February 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
26
Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

Florida’s Space Coast is Well-Positioned to Dominate the Future of the Aerospace Industry

For more than 60 years, Florida’s Space Coast—anchored by Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS)—has served as a premier gateway to space, driving tourism, high-tech jobs, and statewide economic output. After major federal program shifts in the 2010s led to significant regional job losses, Florida’s modern commercial-space resurgence—supported by Space Florida’s strategy to diversify the supply chain, modernize infrastructure, and attract private capital—has positioned the Space Coast to lead the next era of aerospace growth.

Read more
27282930311
2345
New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

New General Revenue Forecast Adds $572.5 Million for the Next Budget

The General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on January 23 to adopt Florida’s latest GR forecast—the estimate that tells lawmakers how much is available for the next state budget. The updated forecast adds $572.5 million to the amount available for the upcoming budget year, but while meaningful, it amounts to only about one percent of total GR collections.

Read more
678
910
Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Clearwater’s Plan to Establish Its Own Municipal Electric Utility Puts Taxpayers at Risk

Florida TaxWatch examines the City of Clearwater’s plan to acquire Duke Energy Florida’s electric distribution assets and establish a municipal electric utility (MEU) in response to concerns over electric rates and service quality. While the City’s feasibility study projects modest short-term rate savings, Florida TaxWatch finds those projections rely on unrealistic assumptions—most notably an “overnight” conversion that ignores the likely decade-long, costly eminent domain process required to acquire Duke’s assets. Drawing on national municipalization case studies, the report highlights high failure rates, underestimated acquisition and severance costs, loss of economies of scale, and substantial financial exposure for taxpayers. Florida TaxWatch concludes that the proposed MEU represents a high-risk endeavor with limited upside and recommends the City pursue a renegotiated franchise agreement with Duke Energy Florida as a more prudent path forward.

Read more
1112131415
16171819202122
2324252627281
2345678

Archive