/ Categories: Op-Eds, Blog

Dominic Calabro: ‘Hurricane tax’ — wrong idea at the wrong time for Florida homeowners

'Hardworking Americans at any income level will pay higher insurance premiums.'

It has been a busy year for disasters, as evidenced by a recent study showing that about 1 in 3 Americans lives in a county hit by a weather disaster in just the past three months.

As bad as that sounds, there is a bigger storm ahead.

Congress is set to impose a “hurricane tax” that would raise insurance premiums, particularly for climate-related catastrophes. The provision buried in the Joe Biden administration’s Made in America Tax Plan (MATP) would hike taxes on reinsurers and disproportionately affect Florida residents’ home and property insurance rates. Reinsurance companies are the financial backstop to a number of insurance companies that underwrite homeowner policies in Florida. Because so much capital is at risk and the probability of losses is uncertain, it is incredibly expensive to insure catastrophic losses, so when a property owner buys a homeowner’s insurance policy, the insurance company buys reinsurance to hedge their risk.

The MATP provision would increase the cost of reinsurance in two ways: increasing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% and imposing a global minimum tax with proposed rates from 15% to 28%. These costs will be passed down to property insurance companies and then to property owners, increasing premiums for homeowners and businesses.

Though these changes will affect the cost of insurance for all U.S. consumers, the price increases will be largest for those living in areas exposed to catastrophe losses, making it essentially a hurricane tax on Floridians, one that many cannot afford when they are already paying some of the highest property insurance premiums in the nation.

How much will it cost Floridians?

Based on a recent estimate by the R Street Institute, Florida insurance rates are expected to grow by $864 million to $1.62 billion. As these tax increases are passed through to consumers, they will effectively tax everyone who buys insurance, regardless of income.

The White House has made promises that the tax plan will not impact those with incomes under $400,000, but that’s not actually possible.

The taxation provisions on businesses and offshore reinsurance companies will ultimately be passed onto millions of consumers at all income levels in the form of higher premiums to protect their homes and small businesses. An honest look at the Biden Tax Plan reveals this basic fact and truth: hardworking Americans at any income level will pay higher insurance premiums because of this onerous provision.

Oftentimes, well-intentioned but ill-conceived public policy can exacerbate an already strained system. This hurricane tax is the wrong idea at the wrong time for Floridians. Any unwarranted increases in insurance premiums will only result in putting homeownership farther out of reach for many families.

There is still time to fix this issue. Congress can amend the current proposal to remove this hurricane tax that adversely impacts Florida and other coastal states.

___

Dominic M. Calabro is president and CEO of Florida TaxWatch, an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit taxpayer research institute that serves as the eyes and ears of Florida’s taxpayers.

 

Originally Published in Florida Politics

Print
5544
0Upvote 0Downvote
«September 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728
Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Florida has proven ideas, demonstrated wins, and active tools; now it needs permanence. By embedding efficiency into the annual budget cycle—backed by transparent tracking and regular reporting—the state can convert sporadic initiatives into sustained savings and better service delivery for taxpayers.

Read more
293031
12
Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals explains how Florida’s 2020 Census undercount—about 750,000 residents (3.48%)—reduced the state’s political representation and likely cost billions of dollars in federal funding over the decade. The report examines what Florida stood to gain if the count had been accurate and how proposed changes to who is counted could affect future apportionment.

Read more
34
The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

Florida TaxWatch’s The Taxpayers’ Guide to Florida’s FY2025-26 State Budget explains the Legislature’s $114.8 billion spending plan (after $376 million in line-item vetoes)—a 3.2% decrease from FY2024-25—while maintaining $12.6 billion in reserves. General Revenue (GR) spending rises by $556 million, and the recurring GR base increases by $1.9 billion, even as total positions fall to 111,886 (-1,871).

Read more
567
8910
Trends in the Cost of Construction Materials

Trends in the Cost of Construction Materials

Construction is a cornerstone of Florida's economy, contributing $97 billion (5.7 percent) to the state's GDP in 2024. However, rising material costs are presenting significant challenges to the industry, impacting everything from large-scale infrastructure projects to residential home building and affordability for Florida taxpayers. This report from Florida TaxWatch examines the national and statewide trends driving these price increases and their potential consequences.

Read more
11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive