Derailing Brightline – The Cost of Taxpayer-Funded Lawsuits

America’s love affair with trains began in the 1860s with the creation of the first intercontinental railroad. Linking the east and west coasts by rail opened new opportunities for commerce and began a love affair between Americans and trains that continues to this day. The construction of additional railroad lines facilitated the establishment and growth of towns in the Midwest and West by providing a relatively rapid means of transporting goods and people. Towns depended on the railroads and, therefore, were developed along railroad lines. In the East, railroads were built to serve existing towns and cities.

All Aboard Florida (AAF) is a privately-owned and operated intercity passenger rail service. When fully operational, AAF will provide express passenger rail service (known as “Brightline”) from Miami to Orlando, with stops in Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. With top speeds ranging from 79 mph to 125 mph, and a minimal number of planned stops between Miami and Orlando, Brightline will offer passengers an opportunity to travel from Orlando to Miami in roughly three hours.

Unlike other high-speed rail projects, Brightline will not require direct taxpayer appropriations. Ridership risk will be borne by the private sector. Funding for the construction and operation of Brightline will come from a combination of tax-exempt private activity bonds (PABs), which are backed by project revenues, and federal Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program loans and loan guarantees. Should the project default, only those who invested in the project are on the hook, not the taxpayers.

When completed, Brightline will pass through the Treasure Coast region of the state without any planned stops. This has prompted local governments in the Treasure Coast region to pursue legislative and legal remedies in an attempt to derail Brightline.

Documents to download

  • AAF-FINAL(.pdf, 1.82 MB) - 2378 download(s)

Previous Article 2017 Annual Report
Next Article Budget Watch - Proposed Budgets Close in Amount, but Big Differences Remain
Print
11079
0Upvote 0Downvote
«September 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728
Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Florida has proven ideas, demonstrated wins, and active tools; now it needs permanence. By embedding efficiency into the annual budget cycle—backed by transparent tracking and regular reporting—the state can convert sporadic initiatives into sustained savings and better service delivery for taxpayers.

Read more
293031
12
Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals explains how Florida’s 2020 Census undercount—about 750,000 residents (3.48%)—reduced the state’s political representation and likely cost billions of dollars in federal funding over the decade. The report examines what Florida stood to gain if the count had been accurate and how proposed changes to who is counted could affect future apportionment.

Read more
34
The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

Florida TaxWatch’s The Taxpayers’ Guide to Florida’s FY2025-26 State Budget explains the Legislature’s $114.8 billion spending plan (after $376 million in line-item vetoes)—a 3.2% decrease from FY2024-25—while maintaining $12.6 billion in reserves. General Revenue (GR) spending rises by $556 million, and the recurring GR base increases by $1.9 billion, even as total positions fall to 111,886 (-1,871).

Read more
567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive