Budget Watch - Proposed Budgets for FY2017-18 Far Apart

As we enter the penultimate week of the 2017 Legislative Session, the next state budget is still very much up in the air. The House and Senate spending plans are effectively $4 billion apart. The House budget totals $81.237 billion, and the Senate budget comes in at $83.164 billion, but that does not include almost $2 billion in university tuition that is usually included in the budget (and is included by the House).

Some of the major differences include environmental funding, economic development programs, tourism marketing, the amount of local property taxes for public school funding, universities, member projects, and state employee pay raises. The Senate also funds 113,563 state positions, 1,335 more than the House. The House generally appropriates less money for agency operations.

Conference negotiations have not yet begun and behind the scenes negotiations have not gone smoothly. This morning (April 25), the House convened a special meeting of the Appropriations Committee to pass what it called a continuation budget. The means the same budget as last year, with some necessary changes and all non-recurring appropriations taken out. This was portrayed as a “take it or leave it” offer to the Senate, and the Senate President has subsequently said they will leave it.

There are rumblings of a deal on a basic budget framework and allocations for the various appropriations subcommittees could be released soon, setting the stage for a budget conference. The state constitution requires a 72-hour review period after the conference report is printed before it may be voted on. The conference report cannot be amended; if one chamber votes it down, they must start over.

The Legislature is running out of time to pass the budget before the session ends on May 5. If it fails to do so, lawmakers will have to come back in an extended or special session to pass a budget before the new fiscal year begins on July 1.

As the Legislature prepares to go into budget conference, or pushes it to a later date, this Budget Watch examines the two spending plans and highlights some of the differences that are causing the conflict.

Documents to download

Previous Article The Outlook for Tax Relief from the 2017 Legislature
Next Article 2017 Final Tax Package Analysis
Print
2917
0Upvote 0Downvote
«September 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
25262728
Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Government Efficiency Should Not Be Something We Do Every Four Years

Florida has proven ideas, demonstrated wins, and active tools; now it needs permanence. By embedding efficiency into the annual budget cycle—backed by transparent tracking and regular reporting—the state can convert sporadic initiatives into sustained savings and better service delivery for taxpayers.

Read more
293031
12
Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals

Apportionment Changes Amid Policy Proposals explains how Florida’s 2020 Census undercount—about 750,000 residents (3.48%)—reduced the state’s political representation and likely cost billions of dollars in federal funding over the decade. The report examines what Florida stood to gain if the count had been accurate and how proposed changes to who is counted could affect future apportionment.

Read more
34
The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

The Taxpayer's Guide to Florida's FY2025-26 State Budget

Florida TaxWatch’s The Taxpayers’ Guide to Florida’s FY2025-26 State Budget explains the Legislature’s $114.8 billion spending plan (after $376 million in line-item vetoes)—a 3.2% decrease from FY2024-25—while maintaining $12.6 billion in reserves. General Revenue (GR) spending rises by $556 million, and the recurring GR base increases by $1.9 billion, even as total positions fall to 111,886 (-1,871).

Read more
567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive