Why Taxpayers Should Care about Workforce Instability with Florida’s Public Defenders and State Attorneys

The right to have the assistance of competent defense counsel is implemented through 20 offices of public defenders, one in each judicial circuit. Public defenders and their appointed staff are licensed attorneys who are paid by the state to represent indigent defendants in criminal cases. Their prosecutorial counterparts in each judicial circuit are the state attorneys. State attorneys and their appointed staff are the chief prosecuting officers of all criminal trial courts in their respective circuit and are responsible for seeing that the laws of Florida are faithfully executed. It is essential that the Office of the Public Defender and the Office of the State Attorney in each judicial circuit be properly staffed and supported to make this system work. Providing competitive wages, flexible working conditions, and manageable caseloads, while maintaining low rates of employee turnover, is critical to maintaining a viable job market and a sustainable and competent workforce for these state agencies. Unfortunately, this is not the case in Florida. Both Assistant Public Defenders (APDs) and their Assistant State Attorney (ASA) counterparts are experiencing low salaries and punishing caseloads, which contribute to high rates of employee turnover and frustrating judicial outcomes for those that are represented. In 2004 and 2014, Florida TaxWatch published research reports on APD and ASA salaries and, almost a decade later, salaries for APDs and ASAs is still an issue. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to update its 2004 and 2014 reports on salaries for APDs and ASAs and to gain a better understanding of how low salaries, heavy caseloads, limited work flexibility, and high turnover rates for state attorneys and public defenders affect the workforce stability of these critical positions and the Florida taxpayers they serve and represent.

Documents to download

Previous Article A Closer Look at Florida’s Sales Tax Exemptions
Next Article Commentary: An Inappropriate Cost of Doing Business: Paying the Interchange Fee on Sales Tax for Credit Card Purchases
Print
4484
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive