Comparing the 2018 House and Senate Tax Packages

The House unveiled its 2018 tax cut package (HB 7087) almost a month ago, while the Senate’s did not appear until week 8 of the session when it was amended onto SB 620 in the Appropriations Committee.

The full House has approved its bill, but the Senate has not yet taken up its package. The bills have a lot of similarities, but there are big differences that will have to be negotiated before a final tax cut package is approved.

The House bill is much larger, containing $140.3 million in one- time tax reductions and $249.1 million in recurring cuts. This includes $33.7 million in one-time local revenue reductions and $11.9 million in recurring local cuts. The Senate bill contains $88.0 million in one-time tax reductions and $60.4 million in recurring cuts. This includes $25.7 million in one-time local revenue reductions and $6.5 million in recurring local cuts. The House Ways & Means Chair said on the floor that, due to new priorities (spending for school safety), the final tax package will likely be smaller than the current House package.

Most of the changes are relatively small, and include sales, property, corporate income, documentary stamp, and fuel taxes. The House cuts includes $149.2 million that are not traditional tax cuts, but are tax credits for contributions to state scholarship programs.

Both bills include the Florida TaxWatch priorities of reducing the Business Rent Tax, and the creating of Back to School and Disaster Preparedness sales tax holidays. For more information see our BRT report and our 2017 follow up. Also, see why Florida TaxWatch supports sales tax holidays.

The following is a description of the various tax reduction provisions, showing what is included in both bills, what tax reductions are in both bills with some differences and what is only in the House or Senate bill.

Documents to download

Previous Article Q2 2018 Broward Schools SMART Program Report Review
Next Article Assessing CRC Proposal 88
Print
3641
0Upvote 0Downvote
«December 2025»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
24252627282930
1234
OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

OH, SNAP! Federal Policy Changes Threaten the Stability of Florida's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Administered by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides funds to help low-income households afford low-cost, nutritious meals. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (the OBBB Act), tightening SNAP policies that determine eligibility, benefits, and program administration. Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand how the upcoming changes in SNAP requirements will impact Florida’s budget and its ability to provide much needed food assistance to needy Floridians.

Read more
567
891011121314
15
2025 How Florida Counties Compare

2025 How Florida Counties Compare

This report compares the revenue and expenditure profiles of Florida’s 67 counties to give taxpayers an overview of how their local government stacks up with the rest of the state.

Read more
16
The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

The Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Nova Southeastern University on Florida’s Economy

NSU generated an estimated $293.1 million in state and local taxes within the Tri-County region in FY 2024-25 and an estimated $305.1 million in state and local taxes in FY 2024-25.

Read more
17
Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Transferring Utility Profits to a Municipality's General Fund Increases the Risk of Undercapitalization of Water Assets and Violate Taxpayer Accountability

Setting water utility rates that incorporate the recovery of the costs associated with standard operating expenses and debt obligations is essential to ensuring the short-term and longer-term financial stability of the utility. Once these costs are covered, many publicly owned utilities make transfers to the General Fund (a practice known as “sweeping”) ostensibly to help pay for governmental services that do not generate revenue (e.g., roadway maintenance, public safety, etc.) and to help keep property taxes lower. Keeping property taxes low often means higher municipal utility rates to balance the general budget, a habitual practice that burdens utility customers with cross-subsidies and normalizes underinvestment in infrastructure.

Read more
18
Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

Florida Sheriffs’ Offices Staffing Analysis

In May 2025, Florida TaxWatch and the Florida Sheriff Association conducted a joint survey to local sheriff offices to learn more about law enforcement’s workforce challenges.

Read more
192021
22232425262728
2930311234

Archive