9 Actions Florida Should Take to Help Taxpayers Impacted by Hurricane Ian

1.     Postpone tax notices and waive penalties or interest for late tax filings in affected areas

2.     Extend the date for residents to take advantage of the tax discounts they would normally receive for paying property taxes and special assessments in November and postpone or defer the deadline for property tax installment payments

3.     Protect individual and business taxpayers from the risks for notices that they will likely not receive because their home or business addresses is not accessible anymore

4.     Issue no new audits in severely impacted areas, extend the statute of limitations and postpone existing audits that haven’t reached the assessment stage because these can’t be responded to while entire communities are still recovering

5.     Create procedures for fairly estimating taxes which can’t be calculated because records have been destroyed by the storm, moving away from the current method which significantly overestimates activity if no records are available

6.     Initiate procedures to offer payment plan assistance for late taxes, rather than resorting to the standard collection methods, like liens, levies, or bank freezes

7.     Retroactively apply the recently passed law that provides property tax refunds for residential property rendered uninhabitable as a result of a catastrophic event

8.     Provide tangible personal property relief and allow n on-residential properties rendered uninhabitable to receive property tax refunds

9.     Get Congress to pass a Disaster Tax Relief Act that includes provisions from past packages, including elements such as an Employee Retention Credit, an enhanced casualty loss deduction, and other relief provisions

Other Resources

Florida TaxWatch Statement on Hurricane Ian Recovery

Community Involvement

The Impacts of Impact Fees on the Cost of Housing

Impact fees are (typically) one-time payments imposed on a property developer by a unit of local government. The amount of the impact fee is determined based upon such things as the size of the development and its impacts on the surrounding community. Compared to property tax increases, impact fees are a popular alternative to fund needed infrastructure upgrades because the costs of new infrastructure and services are paid by the property developer and not by the taxpayers who already live there. The Florida legislature considers impact fees to be an “important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth.” 

 

An impact fee imposed by a local government should meet a dual “rational nexus” (rational linkage) test in order to withstand legal challenge. First, a reasonable connection should exist between the anticipated need for additional capital facilities and the population growth generated by the new development. Second, a rational nexus should exist between the local government’s expenditure of impact fee proceeds and the benefits accruing to the new development from those proceeds. The amount of an impact fee should be a “fair” or “proportionate” share of the costs of improvements made necessary by a new development and cannot be imposed to address existing deficiencies (except where exacerbated by the new development). 

 

Impact fees are frequently cited as a factor that drives up the cost of housing. This is critical in a state like Florida, where soaring rent and home prices are making it more difficult for tens of thousands of working and middle-class Florida households to put a roof over their heads. In February 2023, Realtor.com named Miami as the least affordable city in America, with average monthly rents in the metropolitan area exceeding $2,900. Miami’s typical rent takes up 60 percent of a household’s typical income. Miami, along with Tampa and Orlando, have had the fastest growing rents in the country over the past year. 

 

The development community often complains that impact fees drive housing prices up and construction down. Of particular concern is the complaint that impact fees are regressive in nature, placing a disproportionate burden on low-income groups and creating negative effects on housing affordability. Local governments say that impact fees are the only feasible means of financing sufficient new infrastructure in a tax-averse political environment and that they may actually have many positive effects on communities, “serving more as an efficient user fee than as a tax.” 

 

Florida TaxWatch undertakes this independent research project to better understand the effect of impact fees on housing prices. 

Documents to download

Print
5313 Rate this article:
4.0

x