An Introduction to Budget Turkeys and the Sprinkle List

About the Budget Turkey Watch Report

The Budget Turkey Watch report is Florida TaxWatch's annual review of Florida's upcoming budget. The report was started in 1983 and promotes oversight and integrity in the state’s budgeting process based on the principle that: because money appropriated by the Legislature belongs to the taxpayers of Florida, the process must be transparent and accountable, and every appropriation should receive deliberation and public scrutiny. The budget review identifies appropriations that circumvent transparency and accountability standards in public budgeting.

Budget Turkeys are items, usually local member projects, placed in individual line-items or accompanying proviso language that are added to the final appropriations bill without being fully scrutinized and subjected to the budget process.

The Budget Turkey label does not signify judgment of a project’s worthiness. Instead, the review focuses on the Florida budget process, and the purpose of the Budget Turkey label is to ensure that all appropriations using public funds receive the deliberation, debate, and accountability they deserve. While a project may be worthwhile, Budget Turkeys tend to serve a limited (not statewide) area, are often not core functions of government, are more appropriately funded with local or private dollars, and can circumvent competitive bidding or selection as well as oversight and accountability.

Florida TaxWatch is not recommending that the Governor veto any specific project on the Budget Turkey list. We are providing this report to assist the Governor in his budget deliberations, recommending that he not only consider the value and efficacy of a project, but also if it meets turkey-criteria, if it addresses a core state government function, and if it was selected through a fair process that promotes the best interest of taxpayers statewide.

A project that circumvents established review and selection processes or has completed the established process but is funded ahead of much higher priority projects (as determined by the selection process);
Appropriations that are inserted in the budget during conference committee meetings, meaning they did not appear in either the final Senate or House budgets;
Appropriations from inappropriate trust funds; duplicative appropriations; and appropriations contingent on legislation that did not pass; and/or
Appropriations that may have been in the House or Senate budget, but were removed by agreement in conference, only to be added back at the last minute through the supplemental appropriation (“sprinkle”) lists.

The What, Why, and How of the Florida TaxWatch Budget Turkey Watch Report

Budget Turkeys Report Cover

Budget Turkeys are appropriations, usually local member projects, placed in individual line-items or accompanying proviso language that are included in the final appropriations bill without being fully scrutinized or that bypass established budget processes. The Budget Turkey label does not signify judgment of a project’s merit, value, or need. While a project may be worthwhile, Budget Turkeys tend to serve a limited (not statewide) area, are often not core functions of state government, are more appropriately funded with local or private dollars, or circumvent competitive bidding or selection as well as oversight and accountability.

The state shares approximately $5 billion of state revenue sources directly with local governments and school districts, and billions of dollars more are sent down to the local level through the state budget. Local funding with state dollars has its place and every Florida state budget provides significant local funding. In fact, “Aid to Local Governments” is the second largest expenditure category in the budget, trailing only Medicaid. This can be part of a statewide system for which it is generally accepted that the state has responsibility, such as transportation or school construction. There are also state programs to fund projects that are perhaps more local in nature, such as parks, public libraries, fairs, and cultural programs. Adding more local spending through budget earmarks is done at the expense of statewide priorities, core functions, and programs. This is why this spending must receive at least the same level, if not a higher level, of deliberation, transparency, and accountability. This is why the Florida TaxWatch Budget Turkey Watch exists.

Meet the Author:

Kurt Wenner
Kurt Wenner
Senior Vice President of Research
LinkedIn

Documents to download

Previous Article Water Turkeys: Despite Increased Funding for Florida’s Water Resources and the Creation of New Competitive Grants Processes, Local Member Earmarks are Proliferating
Next Article Budget Sprinkle Lists Diminish Confidence in the Budget Process and Should Be Discontinued
Print
3931 Rate this article:
5.0