An Introduction to Budget Turkeys and the Sprinkle List

About the Budget Turkey Watch Report

The Budget Turkey Watch report is Florida TaxWatch's annual review of Florida's upcoming budget. The report was started in 1983 and promotes oversight and integrity in the state’s budgeting process based on the principle that: because money appropriated by the Legislature belongs to the taxpayers of Florida, the process must be transparent and accountable, and every appropriation should receive deliberation and public scrutiny. The budget review identifies appropriations that circumvent transparency and accountability standards in public budgeting.

Budget Turkeys are items, usually local member projects, placed in individual line-items or accompanying proviso language that are added to the final appropriations bill without being fully scrutinized and subjected to the budget process.

The Budget Turkey label does not signify judgment of a project’s worthiness. Instead, the review focuses on the Florida budget process, and the purpose of the Budget Turkey label is to ensure that all appropriations using public funds receive the deliberation, debate, and accountability they deserve. While a project may be worthwhile, Budget Turkeys tend to serve a limited (not statewide) area, are often not core functions of government, are more appropriately funded with local or private dollars, and can circumvent competitive bidding or selection as well as oversight and accountability.

Florida TaxWatch is not recommending that the Governor veto any specific project on the Budget Turkey list. We are providing this report to assist the Governor in his budget deliberations, recommending that he not only consider the value and efficacy of a project, but also if it meets turkey-criteria, if it addresses a core state government function, and if it was selected through a fair process that promotes the best interest of taxpayers statewide.

A project that circumvents established review and selection processes or has completed the established process but is funded ahead of much higher priority projects (as determined by the selection process);
Appropriations that are inserted in the budget during conference committee meetings, meaning they did not appear in either the final Senate or House budgets;
Appropriations from inappropriate trust funds; duplicative appropriations; and appropriations contingent on legislation that did not pass; and/or
Appropriations that may have been in the House or Senate budget, but were removed by agreement in conference, only to be added back at the last minute through the supplemental appropriation (“sprinkle”) lists.

Budget Watch - More Revenue for the Next Budget

As the Florida Legislature prepares to go into conference budget negotiations to finalize the FY2018-19 budget, state estimators gave lawmakers a bit of good news. Florida’s General Revenue (GR) Estimating Conference met on February 9 and forecast that the state would collect an additional $461.8 million in FY2017-18 and FY2018-19. This is money for the new budget that the House and Senate did not know they had when they developed their spending plans in the first half of this session. Estimated GR was revised upward by $181.3 million in FY2017-18 and by $280.5 million in FY2018-19.

The increased estimates are not the result of better-than-expected economic and normal revenue growth. Earlier estimating conferences had adopted slightly weaker near-term national and state economic forecasts. Instead, the change comes mostly from two factors: increased sales tax collections from hurricane rebuilding and a change in how gaming payments from the Seminole Tribe are made.

Since the last estimates were made in August 2017, actual collections have come in slightly below the forecast. The economists believe this is due to disruptions from Hurricane Irma. Without the hurricane and gaming factors, the GR estimates would have largely been unchanged. In fact, more revenue sources had decreased estimates than increased over the two-year period. Sales taxes, the state’s largest revenue source, was increased by $359.4 million over the two years—more than two-thirds of that is from hurricane rebuilding. Indian Gaming revenues were increased by $106.7 million. Some of the increase ($25.3 million) is due to higher net casino winnings, but most ($81.4 million) comes from the change in revenue sharing methodology. The hurricane and the gaming methodology account for 75.7 percent of the total GR increase.

Documents to download

Previous Article 2017 Session Wrap-Up
Next Article 2018 Legislative Wrap Up
Print
4774 Rate this article:
No rating